Skip to content
Buzze Chonow

Will Other States Follow Australia's in Restricting Online Networks for Youth Under Sixteen?

Australia's controversial move to ban social media access for those under 16 is creating waves worldwide. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are monitoring closely to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Momentum

In Europe, a rising number of states are considering comparable measures.

  • The Danish government plans a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that mobile devices and apps are "stealing our kids' childhood". A law is expected to be enacted in the coming year.
  • Norway is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the algorithms".
  • Ireland is developing a digital ID system to confirm the identity and age of social media users. The media minister have stated that an similar ban could be "one of the measures under consideration".
  • In The Spanish government, the leader has urged the legislature to enact a law lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
  • In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has endorsed a related action, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
  • The administration in The Dutch government has advised families to prevent their children from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has adopted a advisory motion supporting a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is granted. While it highlights of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the resolution does not enact mandatory rules.

"A clear age limit is a good first step," said a leading parliamentarian behind the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the administration has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is being dismissed" but insisting any action must be "grounded in strong data".

Earlier, support built behind a bill to introduce controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end weakened. Instead, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the issue.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. One foundation set up by the family of a girl who took her own life after encountering harmful social media material contends that a strict age ban might not make platforms safer and could create a "cliff edge" of harm when young people become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to design platforms and apps that are safe and suitable for young users," stated a influential child protection advocate.

America: A State-by-State Picture

In the United States, legislation is primarily unfolding at the regional level against a backdrop of country-wide gridlock.

  • Utah demands guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and limits overnight use.
  • The state of Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
  • Virginia has approved a regulation limiting teenagers to a single hour of social media access per day, with additional access requiring a guardian's okay.
  • Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise enacted measures demanding parental consent for minors to open social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from various individuals to mimic the Australian path, a federal ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Global Outlook

Apart from the West, further countries are also considering moves.

  • Malaysia intends to restrict social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
  • Brazil has raised the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international organizations strike a more measured tone. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization points out that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

As this worldwide discussion continues, the steps of Australia and others show that governments around the world are no longer prepared to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.

The writer

Katrina Dominguez

A tech enthusiast and writer with a passion for exploring emerging technologies and their impact on society.

Buzze Chonow

Type to search articles.